A child wearing the NeuroLingo headband writes in a workbook at a counter

For schools, learning centers and tutors

An evidence-backed headband for your struggling readers.

NeuroLingo™ is worn for 20 minutes during the reading instruction you already run. In multiple trials, children with dyslexia read unfamiliar words faster and more accurately.

A 15-minute call with our founders, Dr. Alec Sheffield and Luke Knoble.

Founded at Yale
Backed by SOSV / HAX
Competed in TechCrunch

How it works

Twenty minutes, during reading instruction.

20 minutes, at least three times a week.

During the reading instruction already on the schedule.

Works with any reading program.

Orton-Gillingham, Wilson, Barton, Lindamood-Bell, or your school’s own program.

  1. Insert the pads and slide it on.

    Saline pads push into the headband, and it slides on like a pair of glasses.

  2. Start a session.

    The headband delivers a gentle, low-level current to the parts of the brain involved in reading. Most people describe a light tingle for the first few minutes.

  3. Teach as usual.

    The headband does not teach reading. Your instruction does.

What the research says.

Non-invasive brain stimulation of this kind (tDCS) has been studied for more than twenty years, in adults and in children. Over the past decade, research groups in Europe and the United States have tested it in dyslexic children during reading practice. Multiple studies reported larger gains in reading than practice alone.

Read the papers.

Studies on how the brain learns to read, and on what happens when stimulation is paired with reading practice.

A brain model with three reading regions marked: inferior frontal, temporo-parietal, and occipito-temporal cortex
Pediatric review · Neuroimaging

Cognitive Neuroscience of Dyslexia

A review of the pediatric imaging research. Children with dyslexia show differences in the structure and connectivity of the brain’s reading circuits, visible before reading instruction begins, and those circuits change with effective instruction.

D’Mello & Gabrieli, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools (2018)
DOI: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0020
Read the paper
A child wearing stimulation electrodes reads at a computer during a training session
Pediatric dyslexia study · n = 18 · Ages 10–17

First randomized trial in youth with dyslexia

In 18 children and adolescents with dyslexia (ages 10–17), eighteen sessions of tDCS paired with cognitive reading training reduced low-frequency word errors and non-word reading times compared with sham. Gains held at one-month follow-up.

Costanzo et al., Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience (2016)
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150561
Read the paper
Bar charts showing active tES outperforming sham on low-frequency word and non-word reading across four timepoints
Pediatric dyslexia study · n = 26 · Ages 10–17

Reading gains held over six months after treatment

In 26 children and adolescents with dyslexia (ages 10–17), eighteen sessions of tES paired with phoneme-grapheme reading training produced low-frequency word and non-word reading gains that persisted at six-month follow-up.

Costanzo et al., Neuropsychologia (2019)
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.016
Read the paper
A smiling child wearing a stimulation headband with sponge electrodes during a session
Scoping review · 11 studies (n = 225) · Ages 7–31

Eleven studies with positive reading outcomes.

A 2025 scoping review of the tES-for-developmental-dyslexia clinical literature (11 studies, 225 participants total; 8 pediatric trials). Strongest, most consistent signal on non-word decoding.

Constantino et al., CoDAS (2025)
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240134en
Read the paper
After one 14-minute sessionShamActive20% fewerReading errors · sham: 3.85 % of words (no stimulation 3.91)Reading errors · active: 3.07 % of words (bilateral montage 3.10), p < .001 vs sham3.853.07Reading errors% of words13% fasterReading time · sham: 1.23 seconds per word (no stimulation 1.22)Reading time · active: 1.07 seconds per word (bilateral montage 1.08), p < .001 vs sham1.231.07Reading timeseconds per word38% moreWords recalled · sham: 4.88 of 15 (no stimulation 4.80)Words recalled · active: 6.71 of 15 (bilateral montage 6.24), p < .001 vs sham4.886.71Words recalledof 15Rahimi et al., 2022 · n = 17 children (ages 9–12) · all p < .001 vs sham
Pediatric dyslexia study · n = 17 · Ages 9–12

Reading gains tracked auditory-processing gains

In 17 children with dyslexia (ages 9–12), one 14-minute session of anodal tDCS over left superior temporal gyrus cut reading errors by 20%, sped up word reading by 13%, and increased word recall by 38% versus sham, alongside gains in auditory temporal processing and speech-in-noise perception.

Rahimi et al., Neuropsychologia (2022)
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108427
Read the paper
Non-word reading time (s)ActiveSham36384042BeforeAfter1 week1 monthSham · Before: 38.29 sSham · After: 38.08 sSham · 1 week: 37.09 sSham · 1 month: 37.23 sActive · Before: 41.96 sActive · After: 36.96 s (p < 0.01 vs before)Active · 1 week: 38.52 sActive · 1 month: 37.00 s (p < 0.01 vs before)42.038.337.0*37.0** p < 0.01 vs before · Battisti et al., 2022 · n = 24 (ages 9–18)
Pediatric dyslexia study · n = 24 · Ages 9–18

Five daily sessions, effects held at a month

A crossover trial in 24 children and adolescents with dyslexia (ages 9–18): five consecutive daily parieto-occipital tDCS sessions (without reading training) improved non-word reading speed versus baseline, held at one-month follow-up.

Battisti et al., Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986242
Read the paper
Correct answersBeforeAfter0204060Non-words · before: 16.70 correctNon-words · after: 18.70 correct (p = .035)16.718.7Non-wordsp = .035 · n = 10Words in text · before: 43.11 correctWords in text · after: 48.11 correct (p = .012)43.148.1Words in textp = .012 · n = 9Rios et al., 2018 · n = 12 (ages 8–17) · 5 sessions, open-label
Pediatric dyslexia study · n = 12 · Ages 8–17

Five sessions improved reading accuracy

In 12 children and adolescents with dyslexia (ages 8–17), five consecutive tDCS sessions increased correct responses for pseudowords and text. The one-group pre/post study reported average gains of 43.6% and 32.2%.

Rios et al., Child Neurology Open (2018)
DOI: 10.1177/2329048X18798255
Read the paper
Text reading speed (syll/s)ActiveSham3.54.04.55.0BeforeAfter 10 days4 weeks laterSham · before: 3.82 syllables per second (SD 0.85, n = 9)Sham · after 10 days: 4.57 syllables per second (SD 1.00, n = 9), significantly above its own baseline4.6*Sham · 4 weeks later: 4.19 syllables per second (SD 0.44, n = 9)4.2Active · before: 3.81 syllables per second (SD 1.11, n = 11)3.8Active · after 10 days: 4.22 syllables per second (SD 1.05, n = 11), significantly above its own baseline4.2*Active · 4 weeks later: 4.53 syllables per second (SD 1.03, n = 11), significantly above its own baseline4.5** p < .05 vs baseline · Cancer et al., 2026 · n = 20 adults (ages 18–26)
Adult dyslexia study · n = 20 · Ages 18–26

Stimulation made reading-speed gains last

A randomized, sham-controlled trial in 20 university students with dyslexia (ages 18–26): ten daily sessions of rhythm-based reading training with concurrent tDCS. Both groups read text faster right after training. Four weeks later, only the active stimulation group was still significantly above its starting speed.

Cancer et al., Brain and Cognition (2026)
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2026.106408
Read the paper
Text reading speed (wpm)050100Active · before: 99.2 words per minute99BeforeActive · after: about 105 words per minute≈105AfterActive · 1 week after: 114.3 words per minute1141 wkActiveSham · before: 98.1 words per minute98BeforeSham · after: about 100 words per minute≈100AfterSham · 1 week after: 91.3 words per minute911 wkShamp = .01Heth & Lavidor, 2015 · n = 19 adults (ages 21–37) · ± SEM
Adult dyslexia study · n = 19 · Ages 21–37

Adults read faster a week after stimulation

In 19 adults with dyslexia (ages 21–37), five sessions of active or sham tDCS over the left visual motion area across two weeks led to faster oral text reading one week after treatment (114 words per minute for active vs. 91 for sham, with no loss of accuracy). Rapid number naming also sped up with active stimulation only.

Heth & Lavidor, Neuropsychologia (2015)
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.022
Read the paper
Pediatric RCT · In progress

Double Blind Placebo Controlled RCT of NeuroLingo Brain Stimulation on Children with Dyslexia

General Neuro, in progress (2026)

Our ongoing pilots.

Jennifer Golden

Decoding, reading, and phonological awareness

Golden Advantage Education · Montvale, New Jersey

Children with dyslexia use NeuroLingo during Orton-Gillingham tutoring at Golden Advantage Education, led by founder Jennifer Golden, a Certified Orton-Gillingham Specialist since 2003.

Golden Advantage Education ↗A parent and a child wearing the NeuroLingo headband smile down at a workbook together
Two Virginia Tech trial participants wearing NeuroLingo headbands

Language learning

Virginia Tech Language and Culture Institute · Blacksburg, Virginia

English-language learners at Virginia Tech use NeuroLingo during their language classes in a randomized controlled trial.

Language and Culture Institute ↗

See it in a 15-minute demo.

  • The headband, live.
  • The research, with Dr. Sheffield.
  • Pricing and a pilot plan for your program.
Book a demo
A General Neuro team member talks with Virginia Tech trial participants wearing NeuroLingo headbands

Who we are.

Alec Sheffield
Alec Sheffield, Ph.D.
Luke Knoble
Luke Knoble
Zida Sung
Zida Sung

General Neuro was founded at Yale by Alec Sheffield, a computational neuroscientist (Ph.D., Yale) who trained in brain stimulation at Harvard’s Berenson-Allen Center, along with Luke Knoble and Zida Sung, computer and electrical engineers from Virginia Tech, who build the headband and stimulation circuitry. Luke’s brother, Dr. Joseph Knoble, a child psychiatrist and former Chief Fellow at the Yale Child Study Center, serves as our Chief Medical Advisor. We are a public benefit corporation, based in Boston and backed by Yale Tsai CITY and SOSV / HAX.

We have been building brain-stimulation headbands since 2024. Our first-generation headband initially launched on Kickstarter for adult second-language learning and is in use across 22 countries. For our current-generation headband, we redesigned it to be easy to use, with continuous impedance monitoring and a patent-pending electrode positioning system custom-sized to each wearer to replicate the exact bilateral temporo-parietal montage (P7/TP7 and P8/TP8) of the Costanzo group’s pediatric reading trials. This is the same headband we use in our registered language-learning (NCT07762118) and pediatric (NCT07762365) trials as we work to not only replicate the published studies, but improve on them.

Advisors

Dr. Joseph Knoble, M.D.
Dr. Joseph Knoble, M.D. Chief Medical Advisor

Former Chief Fellow of Psychiatry at the Yale Child Study Center. Clinical advisor for NeuroLingo.

Jennifer Golden
Jennifer Golden Curriculum & Assessment Advisor

Certified Orton-Gillingham Specialist since 2003, Reading Specialist, Special Education Teacher, and founder of Golden Advantage Education.